Author Archives: Kemp

Conservatives and Liberals

Conservatives and Liberals Do Think Differently

In this article, Mark Beeman and Jordan Grafman have conducted a study about how conservatives and liberals (on a political spectrum) differ in thought and problem-solving processes. The study was conducted with 130 people, randomized with ethnicity and age. These people had to solve (non-political) problems using the Compound Remote Associate (CRA) problems.  They were able to possibly say that conservatives think more structurally and persistent cognitive styles, while liberals were able to have “A-HA!” moments and use instinct to solve problems. Both groups have shown the ability to use both methods, but usually use the method most comfortable or most repeated to solve these problems.

Beeman, M., & Grafman, J. (2016, March 15). Conservatives and liberals do think differently. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from

Neurofeedback Illuminates Personalized Ways to Self-Motivate

Neurofeedback Illuminates Personalized Ways to Self-Motivate

Knowing how to unlock the keys to your brain and how to use those unlocked doors to your advantage is exciting. I for one need to know how to keep my “volition switch” on so I can be more motivated to do the things that are important to me.

Very interesting to know about how the brain works to be able to make us more motivated, and just because of a reward system is activated by using personal thoughts and mental imagery.

Students Think Better While Standing

Students Think Better While Standing

Students Think Better While StandingNew research suggests standing tests improve cognitive performance among high school students.

The study is the first to find evidence of neurocognitive benefits of stand-height desks in classrooms — where students are given the choice to stand or sit based on their preferences.

Researchers from the Texas A&M School of Public Health studied high school freshman assessing academic performance at the beginning and again at the end of the academic year.

Study findings appear in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Ranjana Mehta, Ph.D. explored the neurocognitive benefits using four computerized tests to assess executive functions. Executive functions are cognitive skills we all use to analyze tasks, break them into steps and keep them in mind until we get them done.

These skills are directly related to the development of many academic skills that allow students to manage their time effectively, memorize facts, understand what they read, solve multi-step problems, and organize their thoughts in writing.

Because these functions are largely regulated in the frontal brain regions, a portable brain-imaging device (functional near infrared spectroscopy) was used to examine associated changes in the frontal brain function by placing biosensors on students’ foreheads during testing.

“Test results indicated that continued use of standing desks was associated with significant improvements in executive function and working memory capabilities,” Mehta said.

“Changes in corresponding brain activation patterns were also observed.”

While prior studies focused on energy expenditure the current study observed increased attention and better behavior of students using standing desks. Mehta’s research study is the first study not subject to bias or interpretation that objectively exams students’ cognitive responses and brain function while using standing desks.

“Interestingly, our research showed the use of standing desks improved neurocognitive function, which is consistent with results from previous studies on school-based exercise programs,” Mehta said.

“The next step would be to directly compare the neurocognitive benefits of standing desks to school-based exercise programs.”

“There has been lots of anecdotal evidence from teachers that students focused and behaved better while using standing desks,” added Mark Benden, Ph.D., CPE, co-researcher and director of the Texas A&M Ergonomics Center.

“This is the first examination of students’ cognitive responses to the standing desks, which to date have focused largely on sedentary time as it relates to childhood obesity.”

Experts believe continued investigation of this research may have influence policy makers, public health professionals and school administrators to consider simple and sustainable environmental changes in classrooms.

The small changes may help to reduce obesity and enhance cognitive development and education outcomes.

Source: Texas A&M/EurekAlert

Nauert PhD, R. (2016). Students Think Better While Standing. Psych Central. Retrieved on January 30, 2016, from